<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Sport</title>
		<link>http://avatargame.forumotion.com/sport-f16/-t1.htm</link>
		<description></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:23:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Manchester United - American club ??</title>
			<link>http://avatargame.forumotion.com/sport-f16/manchester-united-american-club-t7.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Avatar LIS</dc:creator>
			<description>Man U's footballers, trainers and the owners are from all over the world, as are many other teams - Chelsea Football Club (CFC) for example. Should this be allowed. Does it improve the club and the sport. Should there be a change of name? After all it is only based there now. It's definitely an International organisation.

I'm partly against it because I am a little old fashioned and I don't like overpriced sports. It is a sport and not a business.



I'll let others develop this further. </description>
			<category>Sport</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://avatargame.forumotion.com/sport-f16/manchester-united-american-club-t7.htm#9</comments>
			<guid>http://avatargame.forumotion.com/sport-f16/manchester-united-american-club-t7.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>